MAES, E., KRYPOTOS, A. M., BODDEZ, Y., ALFEI, J. M, D’HOOGE, R., DE HOUWER, R., & BECKERS, T. (IN PRESS). FAILURES TO REPLICATE BLOCKING ARE SURPRISING AND INFORMATIVE - REPLY TO SOTO (IN PRESS). JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: GENERAL. — PREVIEW

  TITLE AUTHOR INSTITUTION DATE ABSTRACT DOWNLOAD
MAES, E., KRYPOTOS, A. M., BODDEZ, Y., ALFEI, J. M, D’HOOGE, R., DE HOUWER, R., & BECKERS, T. (IN PRESS). FAILURES TO REPLICATE BLOCKING ARE SURPRISING AND INFORMATIVE - REPLY TO SOTO (IN PRESS). JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY: GENERAL. Jan De Houwer UGENT 2018 03
714kb

The blocking effect has inspired numerous associative learning theories and is widely cited in the literature. We recently reported a series of 15 experiments that failed to obtain a blocking effect in rodents. Based on those consistent failures, we claimed that there is a lack of insight into the boundary conditions for blocking. In his commentary, Soto (in press) argues that contemporary associative learning theory does provide a specific boundary condition for the occurrence of blocking, namely the use of same- versus different-modality stimuli. Given that in ten of our 15 experiments same-modality stimuli were used, he claims that our failure to observe a blocking effect is unsurprising. We cannot but disagree with that claim, because of theoretical, empirical, and statistical problems with his analysis. We also address two other possible reasons for a lack of blocking that are referred to in Soto’s (in press) analysis, related to generalization and salience, and dissect the potential importance of both. While Soto’s (in press) analyses raises a number of interesting points, we see more merit in an empirically guided analysis and call for empirical testing of boundary conditions on blocking.

COOL

Mechanisms of conscious and unconscious learning

BELSPO logo

KULUCL.UKUCL
UGENTULBSUSSEX